apolloa
Oct 30, 03:53 PM
Sony Ericsson have been making phones for years, they actually pretty much invented the touch screen smartphone market! This is an interesting concept they have been playing with for a very long time so don't be surprised. Will it be good? Of course it will, will it be successful? Who knows, will it be released? Not sure because the PSP2 is rumoured to be immensely powerful. Still it has a lot of potential and an Android handset made by SE with the Playstation brand behind it and proper game controls!! Yes please! Would I replace my iPhone 4 with one? oohhhhhhh now that's a question...
I have the first gen PSP, it was a Christmas present as I wanted one the first time I saw it and I'll never sell it, so not sure if I would get a PS phone.
I have the first gen PSP, it was a Christmas present as I wanted one the first time I saw it and I'll never sell it, so not sure if I would get a PS phone.
John88
Apr 27, 08:25 AM
They apologized, and sent me a new order yesterday.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MarkCollette
Oct 25, 12:55 PM
Does anyone know what GPU you need to get resolution independence?
- Have an address bar so I can copy and paste file locations. Really useful to a developer, especially with working between the Finder and Terminal.
Drag-n-drop file/folder in terminal (you can drag icon in title bar too)
- Have a way of seeing how much disk space directories and their children take up, both with number sizes and graphically.
Info window? You won't have the graphical view, though.
Cool, at least now I'll be able to copy things from the Finder to the Terminal with your approach. Still won't work in reverse though.
The thing is that the size is around a six digit number, something that easily would fit in the existing Finder window, without needing another popup inspector window. Especially on small 1024x768 screens like my 12" iBook.
Web pages are NOT resolution independent for the most part.
Not disagreeing with you at all, but just thinking how sad this is. Anyone remember when HTML first came out, it was a language to describe the logical structure of a document, not really how to lay it out. The idea being that any browser on any platform or device could render it however. And here we are, where websites are made to fit only at 800x600 or 1024x768, and won't take advantage of larger resolution screens.
Yeah I don't think so. Unless you scale it to an exact multiple, it's going to look like crap.
Depends on the anti-aliasing algorithm. If it's done in hardware, then exact multiples shouldn't be an issue.
I'm with you all the way on this.
On the download, right-click yr desktop and click keep arranged by ...whatever you like... to prevent from the downloads stacking up eachother
Thank you, but I put my icons in specific places on my Desktop, so if I organised by name or anything, then it would jumble everything up.
- Have an address bar so I can copy and paste file locations. Really useful to a developer, especially with working between the Finder and Terminal.
Drag-n-drop file/folder in terminal (you can drag icon in title bar too)
- Have a way of seeing how much disk space directories and their children take up, both with number sizes and graphically.
Info window? You won't have the graphical view, though.
Cool, at least now I'll be able to copy things from the Finder to the Terminal with your approach. Still won't work in reverse though.
The thing is that the size is around a six digit number, something that easily would fit in the existing Finder window, without needing another popup inspector window. Especially on small 1024x768 screens like my 12" iBook.
Web pages are NOT resolution independent for the most part.
Not disagreeing with you at all, but just thinking how sad this is. Anyone remember when HTML first came out, it was a language to describe the logical structure of a document, not really how to lay it out. The idea being that any browser on any platform or device could render it however. And here we are, where websites are made to fit only at 800x600 or 1024x768, and won't take advantage of larger resolution screens.
Yeah I don't think so. Unless you scale it to an exact multiple, it's going to look like crap.
Depends on the anti-aliasing algorithm. If it's done in hardware, then exact multiples shouldn't be an issue.
I'm with you all the way on this.
On the download, right-click yr desktop and click keep arranged by ...whatever you like... to prevent from the downloads stacking up eachother
Thank you, but I put my icons in specific places on my Desktop, so if I organised by name or anything, then it would jumble everything up.
zedsdead
Jan 21, 03:29 PM
Apple displays will have to be updated before the end of the year to keep their promise of eliminating harmful chemicals etc. for Greenpeace's sake. When I don't know, I would think either very soon 1 month or late summer.
I expect them at either NAB in April or WWDC. I imagine they will be MUCH thinner than they are now, and will likely have an isight built-in and maybe HDMI. The 24" will probably replace the 23." Outside of that I do not expect much from Apple in the display department. Should be interesting to see if Apple goes with the Glossy Displays (or maybe will make both and give customers an option).
I expect them at either NAB in April or WWDC. I imagine they will be MUCH thinner than they are now, and will likely have an isight built-in and maybe HDMI. The 24" will probably replace the 23." Outside of that I do not expect much from Apple in the display department. Should be interesting to see if Apple goes with the Glossy Displays (or maybe will make both and give customers an option).
didb
Mar 31, 07:30 AM
What are the chances of seeing this on e.g. Windows anytime soon? It would really broaden the connections and usefulness of the quite neat piece of app. Anything new on this case?
IJ Reilly
Oct 12, 05:41 PM
And if you need to use those pages or keynote projects at work or in school?
Define "need to use." I use Pages for all of my reports, and output to PDF for presentation to my clients. If they need a Word version, I export it as Word. Never had a single complaint. I present in Keynote quite often, sometimes saving the slides in PDF form. Never had a complaint there either; in fact the Keynote presentations in particular get rave reviews.
I don't get why people manufacture so many impediments that don't exist to using something other than MS Office. I would loathe the thought of being chained to MS Office, or anything else for that matter, for the rest of my life.
Define "need to use." I use Pages for all of my reports, and output to PDF for presentation to my clients. If they need a Word version, I export it as Word. Never had a single complaint. I present in Keynote quite often, sometimes saving the slides in PDF form. Never had a complaint there either; in fact the Keynote presentations in particular get rave reviews.
I don't get why people manufacture so many impediments that don't exist to using something other than MS Office. I would loathe the thought of being chained to MS Office, or anything else for that matter, for the rest of my life.
twentytwo22
Mar 31, 07:04 PM
Check it out
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CEkQoAQwBA&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FWrsford&ei=ExSVTZ3oJcrOiAKir7X-CA&usg=AFQjCNFTEtohfYMg1DSWSuRbOk2c1PmOaQ&sig2=v9vFkrSFb7OKbQdAaeLYEQ
Just came to post the same thing. Seriously hope this isn't BS.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CEkQoAQwBA&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FWrsford&ei=ExSVTZ3oJcrOiAKir7X-CA&usg=AFQjCNFTEtohfYMg1DSWSuRbOk2c1PmOaQ&sig2=v9vFkrSFb7OKbQdAaeLYEQ
Just came to post the same thing. Seriously hope this isn't BS.
Avalontor
Mar 14, 07:07 PM
Who didn't see this coming? Microsoft is crashing...hard!!!
really? breathe deep and try that again, you're not even close.
really? breathe deep and try that again, you're not even close.
macg4
Dec 18, 08:15 AM
think about my $10 offer +shipping. i will put it to use.
babboxy
Jan 16, 01:26 PM
(wrong place, please delete)
betty02
Nov 14, 02:37 PM
Hi! This might be a bit difficult but would be very useful for me posting at my blog.
I would like to have something like this: (example of a page talking about the iBook)
Check for (link)Ibooks(/link) on Ebay
I would like this to be automatically at the end of the page when I write a post on the blog.
I dont know PHP very well but i was thinking something like this:
At each page, I could add a value like Value=Ibook G4 and then make it make a custom ebay URL that searches for Ibook G4 (thats easy to do).
I would insert all those codes at the PHP theme file for where the posts appear and just add ex: value=iBook G4 in my posts everytime
(I already have adsense ads that appear automatically)
Anyone here know their PHP/HTML to help me out doing this?
Thanks!
Theres nothin hard really about this, just when you type in your blog content add this in
<a href="http://search.ebay.co.uk/search/search.dll?cgiurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcgi.ebay.co.uk%2Fws%2F&fkr=1&from=R8&satitle=iBook&category0=" >NAME OF LINK e.g IBooks On E-Bay</a>
Simple
I would like to have something like this: (example of a page talking about the iBook)
Check for (link)Ibooks(/link) on Ebay
I would like this to be automatically at the end of the page when I write a post on the blog.
I dont know PHP very well but i was thinking something like this:
At each page, I could add a value like Value=Ibook G4 and then make it make a custom ebay URL that searches for Ibook G4 (thats easy to do).
I would insert all those codes at the PHP theme file for where the posts appear and just add ex: value=iBook G4 in my posts everytime
(I already have adsense ads that appear automatically)
Anyone here know their PHP/HTML to help me out doing this?
Thanks!
Theres nothin hard really about this, just when you type in your blog content add this in
<a href="http://search.ebay.co.uk/search/search.dll?cgiurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcgi.ebay.co.uk%2Fws%2F&fkr=1&from=R8&satitle=iBook&category0=" >NAME OF LINK e.g IBooks On E-Bay</a>
Simple
FireSokar
Mar 27, 12:31 PM
Let's hope that's the case! My iPad 2 is a paperweight without jailbreak :)
I can't wait to install infinifolders again, hate having 3 different game folders. Also retina pad will be nice. Actually do miss installous I purchased an few ipad apps that I wish I would have tried first (Yes I actually do buy apps, just like trying first). Damn GV Connect was supposed to let me make calls using Google voice, but you have to install another app that is only iPhone sized.
I can't wait to install infinifolders again, hate having 3 different game folders. Also retina pad will be nice. Actually do miss installous I purchased an few ipad apps that I wish I would have tried first (Yes I actually do buy apps, just like trying first). Damn GV Connect was supposed to let me make calls using Google voice, but you have to install another app that is only iPhone sized.
DeSnousa
Aug 16, 04:04 PM
Try increase http://calxalot.homeip.net/InCrease/
Its a great app that i use to fold and has the ability to close and still run F@H in the background. Just make sure you put 3446 as you team in the preferences as its default team is team mac os x ;)
Its a great app that i use to fold and has the ability to close and still run F@H in the background. Just make sure you put 3446 as you team in the preferences as its default team is team mac os x ;)
SandboxGeneral
Mar 31, 05:51 PM
So, I'm trying to connect my DirecTV reciever to an Airport Base Station that I want to extend my wireless network, which is configured using a Siemens Gigaset router for our Frontier internet.
In Airport Utility, I've got "extend a wireless network" selected, but when I try to select my specific wireless network, it says "the network you've selected cannot be extended".
So I guess my question is this: is there a way to make my Gigaset router wireless network extendable, or will I only be able to use my Airport base to extend other Apple wireless routers?
I am almost positive you cannot extend via airport extreme any other non apple device. Someone please correct me if I am wrong.
Took me a few minutes of a MRoogle search and a search on support.apple.com, but I found this:
Question: Can AirPort Express wirelessly extend ("repeat" or "rebroadcast") the network of a third-party access point?
Answer: No. But it can wirelessly extend the range of a WDS network that is being hosted by an AirPort Extreme Base Station or another AirPort Express.
AirPort Express frequently asked questions (FAQ) (http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1515?viewlocale=en_US)
In Airport Utility, I've got "extend a wireless network" selected, but when I try to select my specific wireless network, it says "the network you've selected cannot be extended".
So I guess my question is this: is there a way to make my Gigaset router wireless network extendable, or will I only be able to use my Airport base to extend other Apple wireless routers?
I am almost positive you cannot extend via airport extreme any other non apple device. Someone please correct me if I am wrong.
Took me a few minutes of a MRoogle search and a search on support.apple.com, but I found this:
Question: Can AirPort Express wirelessly extend ("repeat" or "rebroadcast") the network of a third-party access point?
Answer: No. But it can wirelessly extend the range of a WDS network that is being hosted by an AirPort Extreme Base Station or another AirPort Express.
AirPort Express frequently asked questions (FAQ) (http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1515?viewlocale=en_US)
BenRoethig
Oct 12, 04:15 PM
(1) Not even close to every machine ships with a productivity suite... in fact, if you look closely at what you're paying for when you buy most PC machines, those products that "ship standard" with your fancy new PC are built into the price. Most customizable online shops (Dell, et al.) allow you to remove that software and lower the price. So obviously, they are not free.
(2) iWork is undoubtably being groomed as a direct competitor to Office. There's no disputing that. It CURRENTLY is a replacement for AppleWorks, because it's still young and undeveloped in places, but it would be insane for Apple not to try and pursue part of the Office marketshare. It's an untapped resource, and frankly the Office programs are not very well constructed (with the exception of Excel). Outlook, Word, and PowerPoint are pretty lousy, and while Access is solid, it's certainly not leaps and bounds better than (PageMaker) <-- EDIT: Sorry, meant FileMaker.
(3) Bundling software, and then looking for profit on the backend with upgrades is a reasonable answer to the question. There's something to be said for that. But in the end, I think you're comparing Apples and Oranges. While at current, iWork is undeveloped, it is (as I said) being groomed to be a full suite of productivity Apps. iLife is a wonderful package of Apps, but they do not replace Pro Apps. iPhoto is garbage compared to Aperture or Photoshop. Pages is certainly not garbage compared to Word, and Keynote is already a much better App than PowerPoint. So I think there's a flaw in the argument here...
The only ones who even remotely have iWork tagged as an office competitor are those hardcore mac users despise anything that doesn't have the Apple logo on it. It is a consumer application. If iWork is not shipped with every Mac, nine times out of ten they're going to buy some version of office because that's the standard that everyone knows. I used Claris then Appleworks until it got too far behind pretty much because it came with my Mac.
I agree that they'd be better off bundling iWork while it only consists of Pages and Keynote, as a taster for the eventual suite-scale upgrade. I have absolutely no use for Keynote anyway, so as far as I'm concerned, the money is just for Pages, which is not much of a sweetener compared with the Educational version of Office.
For those in an Office or College setting, there isn't going to be much defending against Office student and teacher. Most computer tasks are built around office. Add in the option of a more familiar interface option for word processing and light duty spreadsheet and database apps, iWork and the Mac would have a lot going for it over PCs with MS Works.
(2) iWork is undoubtably being groomed as a direct competitor to Office. There's no disputing that. It CURRENTLY is a replacement for AppleWorks, because it's still young and undeveloped in places, but it would be insane for Apple not to try and pursue part of the Office marketshare. It's an untapped resource, and frankly the Office programs are not very well constructed (with the exception of Excel). Outlook, Word, and PowerPoint are pretty lousy, and while Access is solid, it's certainly not leaps and bounds better than (PageMaker) <-- EDIT: Sorry, meant FileMaker.
(3) Bundling software, and then looking for profit on the backend with upgrades is a reasonable answer to the question. There's something to be said for that. But in the end, I think you're comparing Apples and Oranges. While at current, iWork is undeveloped, it is (as I said) being groomed to be a full suite of productivity Apps. iLife is a wonderful package of Apps, but they do not replace Pro Apps. iPhoto is garbage compared to Aperture or Photoshop. Pages is certainly not garbage compared to Word, and Keynote is already a much better App than PowerPoint. So I think there's a flaw in the argument here...
The only ones who even remotely have iWork tagged as an office competitor are those hardcore mac users despise anything that doesn't have the Apple logo on it. It is a consumer application. If iWork is not shipped with every Mac, nine times out of ten they're going to buy some version of office because that's the standard that everyone knows. I used Claris then Appleworks until it got too far behind pretty much because it came with my Mac.
I agree that they'd be better off bundling iWork while it only consists of Pages and Keynote, as a taster for the eventual suite-scale upgrade. I have absolutely no use for Keynote anyway, so as far as I'm concerned, the money is just for Pages, which is not much of a sweetener compared with the Educational version of Office.
For those in an Office or College setting, there isn't going to be much defending against Office student and teacher. Most computer tasks are built around office. Add in the option of a more familiar interface option for word processing and light duty spreadsheet and database apps, iWork and the Mac would have a lot going for it over PCs with MS Works.
madamimadam
Oct 6, 08:13 AM
$2000.... let's not get silly now
$AU2000 I could believe but not $US2000.
$AU2000 I could believe but not $US2000.
jobberwacky
Oct 12, 01:36 AM
Plus, when it comes to numbers, there is no room for error.
Excel truly is the standard in this case (actually doing a good job).
You trust Excel? (Or for that matter Mesa or Google Spreadsheets?)
Try this:
In a new spreadsheet, give the cell A1 the value of 0.2
In A2 enter the formula '=A1*6-1' (the calculated value will also be 0.2)
Then copy this formula to A3 down to ca A40.
For every cell you should get 0.2 as a result, since 0.2 (the result of the cell above) times 6 minus 1 is 0.2. Right?
Right? Try it in Excel, try it in Mesa, try it in Google Spreadsheets.
And then repeat after me:
"I will never again blindly believe in spreadsheet calculations"
[edit: corrected typo, thanks MrSmith! - repeat after me "I will never again blindly believe jobberwacky postings ;-)]
Excel truly is the standard in this case (actually doing a good job).
You trust Excel? (Or for that matter Mesa or Google Spreadsheets?)
Try this:
In a new spreadsheet, give the cell A1 the value of 0.2
In A2 enter the formula '=A1*6-1' (the calculated value will also be 0.2)
Then copy this formula to A3 down to ca A40.
For every cell you should get 0.2 as a result, since 0.2 (the result of the cell above) times 6 minus 1 is 0.2. Right?
Right? Try it in Excel, try it in Mesa, try it in Google Spreadsheets.
And then repeat after me:
"I will never again blindly believe in spreadsheet calculations"
[edit: corrected typo, thanks MrSmith! - repeat after me "I will never again blindly believe jobberwacky postings ;-)]
w_parietti22
Sep 28, 12:00 AM
Wow! That was a great show! :)
panzer06
Feb 24, 08:19 AM
Honestly they should just kill the 13" mbp.
I thought they just did :rolleyes:
Cheers,
I thought they just did :rolleyes:
Cheers,
firefoxnx
Jan 9, 10:14 AM
Sounds something like the Nokia Internet Tablet but doesn't suck that much.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_770
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_770
aNYthing24
Apr 8, 03:48 PM
Yeah, you'll be good to go after you update it. There's nothing else needed.
MacForScience
Mar 31, 11:08 PM
I'm getting horrible flash performance in full screen. using latest version of Flash from adobe.com and in 1080p resolution
This is a recent thing, about a month or so.
i've tried unchecking hardware acceleration, still horrible. Jumping video and lag. Is there anything I can do?? I've used the mac mini to watch tv online, streaming nhl games, soccer, etc. And now it's unwatchable!! Help!
Thanks
david
Run Disk Utility
Run Cron Scripts
Delete user cache files not the cache folder
Delete the Flash Cache files from your preference folder.
Restart. See if that works.
Cheers
This is a recent thing, about a month or so.
i've tried unchecking hardware acceleration, still horrible. Jumping video and lag. Is there anything I can do?? I've used the mac mini to watch tv online, streaming nhl games, soccer, etc. And now it's unwatchable!! Help!
Thanks
david
Run Disk Utility
Run Cron Scripts
Delete user cache files not the cache folder
Delete the Flash Cache files from your preference folder.
Restart. See if that works.
Cheers
eswank
Apr 29, 11:10 AM
I have a Time Machine back up from a White MacBook that I sold. I started fresh when I purchased my Unibody MacBook Pro. My question is... is there anyway I can grab some of those files from the old Time Machine backup and put on my new MacBook Pro? Any advice would help. Thanks!
andrew5826
Apr 29, 02:17 AM
okay, i tried to create my own custom firmware with sn0wbreeze 2.5.1 but it doesnt give me any option to not install cydia. does anybody know how to not install cydia in a custom firmware?
No comments:
Post a Comment